No refuge for persecuted neighbors: Human Rights and Asylum in the Americas

Main Article Content

Dabney Evans
Brandon Kohrt

Abstract

This paper discusses the current U.S. practices in providing refuge and complying with human rights law. In order better to understand why applications for asylum from Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean have a far poorer success rate than those from any other region of the world, the authors explore the history of U.S. asylum legislation with a specific focus on international human rights documents. They suggest that a U.S. asylum system more concordant with human rights law could contribute to a more equitable granting of asylum status and refugee resettlement.



En este ensayo se discuta las prácticas legales con respecto de los procuradores de asilo en los Estados Unidos de hoy. Al preguntar porque las aplicaciones de los procuradores de asilo del México, de la América Central, y del Caribe típicamente no tengan mucho éxito en los EEUU, los dos autores exploran la historia del sistema de inmigración de los Estados Unidos con foco especial en documentos internacionales sobre los derechos humanos. Proponen reformar ese sistema, levando las prácticas legales de los EEUU más en acuerdo con las leyes internacionales de derechos humanos para crear situaciones más iguales para todos los procuradores de asilo.



Este artigo examina a política atual dos Estados Unidos em asilar refugiados e cumprir com leis internacionais de direitos humanos. Para entender melhor por que os pedidos para asilo de México, América Central, e o Caribe têm um êxito muito menor dos pedidos de qualquer outra região do mundo, os autores examinam a história da legislação estadunidense concernente asilo com um enfoque especial em documentos internacionais de direitos humanos. Os autores sugerem que um sistema de asilo nos Estados Unidos mais concordante com os leis de direitos humanos pode ajudar estabelecer a prática de albergar asilo e tratar com os refugiados de uma maneira mais eqüitativo para todas as regiões do mundo.



Dans cet article il s’agit des procédés actuels aux Etats-Unis pour fournir asile aux réfugiés et pour se conformer à la loi des droits humains. Pour mieux comprendre pourquoi les demandes d’asile du Mexique, de l’Amérique Centrale et des îles Caraïbes témoignent d’un taux de succès bien inférieur à celles des autres régions du monde, les auteurs analysent l’histoire de la législation de l’asile aux Etats-Unis avec une concentration spécifique sur des documents internationaux de droits humains. Ils proposent qu’un système d’asile aux Etats-Unis plus concordant avec la loi des droits humains pourrait contribuer à une accordance plus équitable de statut d’asile et de rétablissement des réfugiés.

Article Details

How to Cite
Evans, D., & Kohrt, B. (2004). No refuge for persecuted neighbors: Human Rights and Asylum in the Americas. AmeriQuests, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15695/amqst.v1i1.6
Author Biographies

Dabney Evans, Emory University

Dabney Evans is the Executive Director of the Emory University Institute of Human Rights. She received her Master of Public Health degree in 1998. Since that time she has served a lecturer in the Department of International Health at the Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University. Dabney teaches courses in “Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Human Rightsâ€, and “Health and Human Rights.†Dabney is coordinator of an intensive public health study trip to Havana, Cuba for Master’s level students. Dabney is co-principal investigator for the “Tibet Trauma Study†which is examining trauma, mental health and perceptions of human rights among adolescent Tibetan refugees.

Brandon Kohrt, Emory University

Brandon Kohrt is an MD-PhD candidate in the Department of Anthropology at Emory University. He is currently coordinator of the Atlanta Asylum Network, an organization working with Physicians for Humans Rights and the Emory Institute for Human Rights to facilitate the medical evaluation of asylum seekers in the southeastern United States. His research addresses the relationship among human rights violations, mental health, and violence in the current conflict between Maoists and government security forces in Nepal. He has also investigated mental health consequences of economic transformation in post-socialist Mongolia.